aleax@mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:

> In general, "a superclass of foo" means "a class X such that foo is a
> sublass of X"

Sure. However, this doesn't equate to the assertion that "next class
in the MRO is the superclass", which is what I was responding to.

--
\ "Even if the voices in my head are not real, they have pretty |
`\ good ideas." —anonymous |
_o__) |
Ben Finney