On Jul 31, 12:34 pm, Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> wrote:
> James Kanze wrote:
> > The Wikipedia is fun for a lot of things, but it can
> > hardly be considered a source of reliable information.

> So the urban legend says, yet I have yet to see with my own
> eyes unrealiable information there. Sure, there are examples.
> I just haven't seen any myself.

I've run into a number of them. But that's not the point. The
point is that there is no guarantee of reliability; unless you
already know the answer, you don't know whether what the article
says is correct or not.

--
James Kanze (Gabi Software) email: james.kanze@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34